Is flexible dieting becoming rigid restraint?

January 17, 2023

If “flexible dieting” has you weighing an apple core to “hit your numbers” there’s nothing flexible about it.

Flexible dieting has been shown to outperform rigid dieting in terms of both physical and emotional outcomes. Yet many people turn this “flexible” approach into another rigid diet.

Turning food into numbers, ignoring hunger cues and creating a pathology around food in order to be “perfect” is not going to improve your relationship with food. And it might not even help you lose weight.

That’s because rigidity is akin to restriction and overly restrictive diets often lead to overeating and weight gain. It seems counterintuitive that trying to lose weight can lead to weight gain but it happens often. Especially when we try to live our lives in a state of restriction.

Use a method that works for you but if you’re not truly approaching a flexible approach with any flexibility, don’t be surprised when the results aren’t what you expected.

Author

Jeb Johnston

Share this post:

Related Posts

    Jun 12, 2020
    We always want to act with intent. Acting with intent ensures that we are doing what matters and we aren’t engaging in activity that is mindless and can lead us astray from our goals.
    Jul 7, 2020
    We’ve been so conditioned to place a moral value on food that we can instantly differentiate between “good” and “bad” choices. Everyone knows ice cream is bad and spinach is good.
    Jun 20, 2023
    If you've spent a lifetime "dieting", the solution isn't another fad diet. And if it's got a name, it's a fad diet.

    Ready to Break Free from Diets, Numbers, and Negative Self-Talk?

    At Food on the Mind, we help you leave behind restrictive diets, harmful habits, and self-doubt. Sign up to our personalized 1:1 coaching and together, let’s develop skills to rebuild your relationship with food, your body, and your mind. This is more than a program — it’s a blueprint for lasting transformation. Together, we’ll build the most empowered version of you.